Nancy and Nick are married. However, they are living separately. She lives in the marital home with the couple’s daughter, Nicole, who is nine years old. Nancy has been Nicole’s primary caretaker since Nicole was born. Nancy believes she is automatically entitled to full legal and physical custody of Nicole. Is Nancy correct?
Not necessarily. Massachusetts does not recognize that the primary caretaker of a child automatically has the right to custody.
Generally, the court will consider matters of custody by examining what is in the best interests of the child. The best interests of the child standard include many factors. The court considers all relevant factors in its custody orders. Each factor may be weighted differently based on the case’s facts.
Naturally, one factor for the Court to consider is which parent has served as the primary caregiver of the child(ren). The Court reviews this factor to determine which parent took on most child-rearing duties. It also considers with whom the child(ren) formed deeper, stronger bonds. However, being the primary caregiver does not always mean the parent will receive custody. The Court will examine the caregiver parent’s level of care. It will then decide if continuing this care benefits the child(ren).
In one case, the Court considered custody of a minor child whose primary caregiver had been the mother but whose father had extensive visitation with the child and took care of the child well during his time with her. The Court looked at factors such as the lack of structure in the mother’s home and the unwillingness of the mother to share information with the father and involve him in key decisions regarding the child. On several occasions, the judge also noted that the mother engaged in conduct that was not in the child’s best interests, including driving her without a car seat and allowing her to sleep in bed with the mother and her boyfriend. The judge, by contrast, noted that the father engaged the child in educational and stimulating activities and that he cared for her everyday needs whenever the child was with him.
The judge ordered that, despite the mother being the child’s primary caregiver, the father should have custody; the Appeals Court affirmed. [1]
The primary caretaker is one factor in custody determinations, but the Courts consider many other factors as well. If you have questions about custody, consult an experienced attorney for advice. Should you wish to schedule a free consultation with our office, you may call 978-225-9030 during regular business hours or complete a contact form here, and we will get back to you at our earliest opportunity.
[1] In re Custody of Zia, 50 Mass. App. Ct. 237 (2000).
About the Author: Damian Turco is the Founder and Managing Partner of Turco Legal and has practiced divorce and family law since 2008.
Damian Turco’s Bio Page | More Blogs from Damian Turco
This article is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as legal advice. Articles on our blog are written at a historical point in time and the information presented accurately reflects the law at the time of the article’s writing. If you’d like to better understand how the law applies to your case, schedule an attorney consultation by calling any of our offices or by clicking the Schedule a Consultation link on this page.